Whitewashing in 2017

In our day and age we seem to think that our society is, for the most part, very diverse.  Everything from the workplace to schools and even our films are often portrayed as diverse both culturally and racially.   Unfortunately that isn’t always the case.  If we are to focus on the film industry for example, we find that their are often times when certain roles are not convincing enough to maintain the ambiance of the scene based on the actor or actress’  visual appearance or ability.  This however isn’t a big deal if you find someone who fulfills one of these two vital roles, but there are often times when directors pick actors and actresses to fill the box office rather than accurately portray a character.  Furthermore, there have been cases where there are perfect actors to fill roles but are not picked purely because of their race.  An example comes from the recent news about a live action Mulan film produced by Disney.  While in the early stages of development the media found that not only the main heroine in the film but many other lead roles would not be played by those of Asian descent.  How? In what world did they think it would be okay to make a film about Chinese heritage and not include Chinese people.  Continually, the director wanted to add a portion to the film that is not seen in the 1998 original version.  This would include an older European (white male) love interest who inevitably saves Mulan’s homeland for her.  This one instance in the very definition of whitewashing in America, rather than an accurate portrayal of the characters and plot it is changed to allow white people to fill the roles.

Personally, I was outraged because the original film, for some of my childhood friends the first time they could see themselves and be excited to share their heritage with others through the popularity of the film.  And to take it away from today’s youth is criminal.



Enforcing a New Red Line?

The world was shocked when they saw the horrifying images of children and adults writhing on the floor, gasping for breath as they foamed at the mouth. On April 4, 2017, the Red Line was crossed again by the ruthless Syrian dictator, Bashar al-Assad, and his murderous regime. Assad launched yet another chemical weapons attack on his own people in Khan Sheikhoun, Syria. This time it was in the form of Sarin gas. Sarin gas is a highly deadly chemical nerve agent that’s banned under international law. The attack killed 89 people and injured dozens more. In retaliation for the attack on civilians, President Donald Trump took much-needed action in America’s first direct military strike against the Assad regime. On his orders, US warships launched 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles at the airbase where the aircraft that preformed the chemical attack were being stored. The strike targeted aircraft, aircraft shelters, petroleum, logistical storage, ammunition supply bunkers, and air defense systems. The strike was successful with 58 of the 59 missiles severely degrading or destroying their intended target. This was a necessary response that should’ve been taken by the Obama administration back in 2013 when Assad used chemical weapons near Damascus killing 1,400 civilians. The United States must continue to enforce the Red Line when it comes to the barbaric use of chemical weapons. It must also work towards a way to unseat Assad and restore order to Syria.

Liberty Still Stands

It has been eighteen days since the 45th president of the United States was sworn in as leader of the free world.  So far, there have been eight signed executive orders and twelve signed presidential memorandums. With the power of the executive branch, it took only three executive orders to effectively alter the policies of our country, turning the nation of immigrants into the laughing stock of the world. Executive orders 13767 and 13768 began the painful and costly task of taking on illegal immigration and building a wall along the southern border. Executive order 13769 bans entry of all people from seven Muslim-majority countries for 90 days and suspends the refugee program for 120 days.  These executive orders affect the make-up of the United States in culture and diversity in ways that even our national monuments contradict.  At the entrance of the Statue of Liberty, engraved on a bronze plaque, is a sonnet written by Emma Lazarus called The New Colossus. It was first written in 1883 and adopted by the Statue of Liberty in 1903. The adoption of the poem gave the statue the characteristics we associate it with today.

The New Colossus

“Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,

With conquering limbs astride from land to land;

Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand

A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame

Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name

Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand

Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command

The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.

‘Keep ancient lands, your storied pomp!’ cries she

With silent lips. ‘Give me your tired, your poor,

Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,

The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.

Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,

I lift my lamp beside the golden door!’”

Millions came to the United States seeing her statue and hearing those words, the “Mother of Exiles.” One by one, they came to the nation that offers “world-wide welcome.” Almost in a mocking cry, she calls out to the countries that drive their citizens away and leave them to fend for themselves. She says, “Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free… Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me…”  With the coming and going of presidents, our stances have differed from time to time for the better and worse.  At this moment in time, we must remember that a president does not make a country. A country is made by the millions of its citizens and shaped by their common beliefs. If you see injustice, stand up to it and make your voice heard.  Presidents come and go, but Liberty still stands, and it’s time to stand with her.